This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
Introduction A recent study recommended 5.2 mmol/L as a cutoff for fetal blood sample (FBS) lactate in labor for the StatStrip Lactate®/Lactate Xpress® lactate meter. In the present study, we validated FBS lactate cutoffs in a larger population‐based setting, with different CTG guidelines, testing external validity. Material and Methods We conducted a prospective population‐based study at Oslo University Hospital, Ullevål, Norway, a tertiary referral obstetric department with 7000 annual deliveries. Women with a singleton fetus in cephalic presentation in gestational week ≥36 + 0 were included in the analyses. We used ROC curves to calculate the area under the curve (AUC) and estimate the optimal cutoff for the following adverse neonatal outcomes: Umbilical cord pH ≤7.10, umbilical cord pH ≤7.05, metabolic acidosis (pH <7.0 and Base deficitextracellular fluid > 12 mmol/L), 1‐minute Apgar score <4, 5‐min Apgar score <7, hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy, and transfer to the neonatal intensive care unit. Analyses were restricted to women with a FBS lactate within 25 min prior to delivery. The study is registered in clinicaltrials.gov ( ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04779294). Results Of 7816 included women, 1466 (19%) had a FBS lactate measurement within 25 min prior to delivery. The calculated optimal cutoff for FBS lactate varied by outcomes: 5‐min Apgar score <7: AUC 0.69 (0.57–0.80), cutoff 4.0 mmol/L; metabolic acidosis: AUC 0.92 (0.78–1.00), cutoff 7.0 mmol/L; hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy: AUC 0.95 (0.86–1.00), cutoff 4.7 mmol/L. Sensitivity increased for some of the outcomes with a decreasing cutoff. Specificity increased for all outcomes with an increasing cutoff. Conclusions We consider an FBS lactate cutoff of ≥5.2 mmol/L a good balance between high sensitivity for adverse neonatal outcomes and an acceptable number of needed interventions.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Berge et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: