Purpose: We evaluated the real-world utility of hydrogel spacer placement for reducing radiation proctitis following prostate cancer radiation therapy using a large-scale claims database. Methods and Materials: We analyzed male patients from a Japanese administrative claims database (DeSC Database) who initiated primary radiation therapy between July 2018 and December 2024. Propensity score weighting using the average treatment effect on the treated method was applied to balance baseline characteristics between spacer users and nonusers. The primary endpoint was the occurrence of endoscopic gastrointestinal hemostasis, and the secondary endpoint was the diagnosis of radiation proctitis. Fine-Gray models were used to estimate subdistribution hazard ratios (sHRs) with death as a competing risk. Conclusions: This large-scale real-world analysis demonstrates that hydrogel spacer placement is associated with a significantly lower incidence of severe radiation proctitis requiring endoscopic hemostasis.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Takeda et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: