OBJECTIVE: To establish the reliability and validity of a computerized self-administered hearing test. DESIGN: Cross-sectional within a comparative study of subjects. STUDY SAMPLE: Subjects were 100 Chinese adults who attended the audiology clinic in a hospital for a hearing test. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in the thresholds of unmasked air-conduction hearing obtained with the computerized self-administered hearing test via a smartphone and those obtained with standard pure-tone audiometry. High test-retest reliability was observed with the self-administered hearing test (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.95), and was comparable with that observed in standard pure-tone audiometry (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.97). The thresholds of the self-administered hearing test measured in a sound-proof booth were not significantly different from those measured in a quiet office room. CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that the computerized self-administered hearing test is a reliable and valid measure of unmasked air-conduction hearing thresholds.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kam et al. (2012) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: