For the analysis of metsulfuron-methyl in the crop soils with a sensitivity limit of 0.3 μg kg−1 dry soil, in the soil extract metsulfuron-methyl was separated from its soil metabolites and the soil impurities by repeated thin-layer chromatographies (TLC). In the cleaned soil extract, diazomethane transformed metsulfuron-methyl 1 into N,N′ -dimethyl metsulfuron-methyl 2 (methyl 2-[[[[(4-methoxy-6-methyl-1,3,5-triazin-2-yl)methylamino]carbonyl]methylamino]sulfonyl]benzoate). In the gas-liquid chromatograph with detection by electron capture (GC-EC) and in the combined gas chromatograph-mass spectrometer (GC-MS), 2 was transformed into 1-dioxy-2-N-methyl-3-keto-1,2-benzisothiazole 3 which was measured by GC-EC with confirmation by GC-MS. The metsulfuron-methyl soil metabolites 2-sulfonamido-methylbenzoate 6, 1-dioxy-3-keto-1,2-benzisothiazole (saccharin) 7 and 2-sulfonamidobenzoic acid 8 were analyzed in the soil of winter wheat crops by a procedure similar to the one for metsulfuron-methyl. After their separation and purification in the soil extracts by TLC, 7 and 8 were methylated, and analyzed as 3 in the GC-EC and GC-MS apparatus where the generated 6 was quantitatively transformed into 3; 6 was analyzed as such with the GC and GC-MS apparatus wherein it was transformed into 3. The sensitivity limit for each metabolite was 0.3 μg of equivalents of metsulfuron-methyl kg−1dry soil. The syntheses of the analysis standards of the metsulfuron-methyl derivatives 2 and 3, and of the metsulfuron-methyl metabolites 6, 7 and 8 are described. The transformation pathways of metsulfuron-methyl and of its derivatives are different from those of the pyridine-pyrimidine sulfonylurea herbicides flupyrsulfuron-methyl and rimsulfuron. The soil analysis of a sulfonylurea -by means of one of its transformation product- needs a previous study of the chemical reactivity of the sulfonylurea. This leads to the analysis procedures for the main soil metabolites of the sulfonylurea.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rouchaud et al. (2001) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: