This study was conducted to evaluate the performance of High-Rate Filter (HRF) as an alternative process to Conventional Primary Sedimentation (CPS) processes and the performance of different configurations of activated sludge and biofilter systems with anaerobic/aerobic zones for efficient textile wastewater treatment. The performance efficiency of the HRF with much shorter hydraulic retention time (HRT: 0.3 h) was very similar to that of the CPS process with a longer HRT of 3.0 h. The highest efficiencies of the systems were achieved by configuring anoxic:anaerobic:oxic:oxic zones for an activated sludge system and anaerobic:oxic: anoxic zones for a biofilter system, respectively. In particular, under the most efficient configurations of the systems, the performance of the biofilter system achieved a higher efficiency than that of the activated sludge system. Compared with the existing physicochemical-sequencing batch reactor system, the most efficient configurations of the HRF/activated sludge system and the HRF/biofilter system with a shorter HRT achieved both higher pollutant removal efficiency and lower sludge production.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kang et al. (2012) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: