This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
Background rapamycin, an mTOR inhibitor used clinically for immunosuppression, shows promise for repurposing in age-related disorders including Alzheimer’s disease (AD). While the pharmacokinetics of daily rapamycin are well-characterized in transplant populations, limited data exist on intermittent dosing regimens in patients with neurodegenerative conditions. Method this open-label pilot study investigated the pharmacokinetic properties of weekly oral rapamycin in 13 patients with early-stage AD. Participants received 7 mg weekly (11 patients) or reduced doses (2 mg and 4 mg; 2 patients) for 26 weeks. Blood concentrations were measured at four timepoints (pre-dose/Cmin, and 1-, 3-, and 48-hours post-dose) during week 13. Results moderate interindividual variability was observed across timepoints (coefficient of variation was 0.28-0.40), with the 48-hour sample showing the lowest variability (CoV = 0.28) and strongest correlation with Cmin from the previous dosing (r = 0.72). Estimate of terminal half-life (68.9 ± 13.6 hours) aligned with previous studies. Conclusions blood concentrations at Cmin were below immunosuppressive levels in all participants. Our findings suggest that weekly rapamycin administration in AD patients results in acceptable pharmacokinetic variability, supporting fixed-dose regimens in future trials. The 48- hour post-dose measurement appears optimal for monitoring blood concentrations. Additionally, our investigation into blood-brain barrier permeability revealed methodological challenges in directly measuring rapamycin in cerebrospinal fluid due to analytical sensitivity limitations. The foremost limitation of this study was the sparse blood sampling schedule, with Cmin collected from the previous dosing occasion which prevented a complete AUC-calculation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Annervik-Wallgren et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: