Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Agrocin-minus mutants of nontumorigenic Agrobacterium vitis strain F2/5 controlled grape crown gall as well as the wild-type strain, indicating that agrocin is not a major factor in the mechanism of biological control. Relative levels of attachment to grape cells by tumorigenic and biocontrol strains were also measured. Attachment of tumorigenic strains (CG49 and K306) and biological control strains (F2/5 and agrocin-minus mutant 1077) was often reduced when mixtures of the strains were applied. However, high populations (10(3) to 10(5) CFU/ml) of all strains attached following mixed inoculations, suggesting that competition for attachment sites is also not a factor in the mechanism of biological control. Transfer of T-DNA to grape by CG49 was prevented or greatly inhibited in the presence of F2/5 or 1077 as measured by expression of the GUS reporter gene. The Ti plasmid virulence genes, however, were induced by exudates from grape shoots that had been inoculated with F2/5. Sonicated and autoclaved preparations of F2/5 and 1077 did not control crown gall or inhibit T-DNA transfer. Control by F2/5 is specific to grape, since gall formation on tomato, sunflower, and Kalanchoe daigremontiana were not inhibited.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bürr et al. (1997) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: