We performed first-principles calculations to simulate the grain boundary decohesion in ferromagnetic bcc iron (Fe) Σ3(111) symmetrical tilt grain boundaries by progressively adding solute atoms [sulfur (S) or phosphorous (P)] to the boundaries. We show that there are two mechanisms of decohesion: (i) fracture surface stabilization with reference to the grain boundary by the segregated solute atoms without interaction between them, and (ii) grain boundary destabilization by a repulsive interaction among the segregated and neighboring solute atoms. It is found that the dominant mechanism for the S-induced decohesion is the former (i), while that for P is the latter (ii). This difference makes P a much weaker embrittling element comparing with S because the mechanism (ii) simultaneously brings about the reduction of the grain boundary segregation energy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yamaguchi et al. (2007) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: