Key result
Coronary angiography for suspected CAD leaves treatment expectations unfulfilled in ~44% of patients.
Why the study?
Healthcare providers and patients may have different perceptions and expectations of outcomes from treatment for suspected coronary artery disease, which may impact patient satisfaction and treatment results.
Does the fulfilment of patient expectations correlate with improvements in health-related quality of life after investigation and treatment for suspected coronary artery disease?
Observational (n=544)
Does the fulfilment of patient expectations correlate with improvements in health-related quality of life after investigation and treatment for suspected coronary artery disease?
Measuring patient expectations and their fulfilment provides a meaningful patient-reported outcome that correlates strongly with improvements in health-related quality of life.
Low expectation fulfilment after angiography for suspected CAD signals gaps in patient-centered care; supports incorporating expectation measures into future CAD outcome trials.
BACKGROUND: Clinical decision-making is often based on evidence of outcome after a specific treatment. Healthcare providers and patients may, however, have different perceptions and expectations of what to achieve from a certain healthcare measure. AIMS: To evaluate patients' expectations, perceptions and health related quality of life (HRQoL) before a care process including coronary angiography for suspected coronary artery disease and to evaluate the fulfilment of these expectations in relation to established patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) 6 months later. Furthermore, an aim was to try to define meaningful patient reported experience measures (PREMs) in this population. METHODS: 544 patients planned for coronary angiography completed a newly developed questionnaire to assess expectations and perceptions of treatment, the expectation questionnaire (ExpQ) and two established HRQoL questionnaires together with the established generic Short-Form 36 (SF36) and the disease specific Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ). RESULTS: Patients had before the intervention, in general, high expectations of improvement after investigation and treatment and there was a positive attitude towards life style changes, medication and participation in decision-making regarding their own treatment. Only, 56.4% of the patients, however, reported fulfilment of treatment expectations. Fulfilment of treatment expectations correlated strongly with improvement in HRQoL after the care process. CONCLUSIONS: To measure patients ´ expectations and fulfilments of these may offer simple and meaningful outcomes to evaluate a healthcare process from a patient ´s perspective. To approach patients' expectations may also strengthen patient involvement in the care process with the possibilities of both higher patient satisfaction and medical results of the treatment.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Odell et al. (2017) conducted an observational in suspected coronary artery disease (n=544). Care process including coronary angiography was evaluated on Fulfilment of treatment expectations. A care process including coronary angiography for suspected coronary artery disease resulted in only 56.4% of patients reporting fulfilment of treatment expectations at 6 months.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: