Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
// Dorte Schou Nørøxe 1 , 2 , Olga Østrup 3 , Christina Westmose Yde 3 , Lise Barlebo Ahlborn 3 , Finn Cilius Nielsen 3 , Signe Regner Michaelsen 1 , Vibeke Andrée Larsen 4 , Jane Skjøth-Rasmussen 5 , Jannick Brennum 5 , Petra Hamerlik 6 , Hans Skovgaard Poulsen 1 , 2 and Ulrik Lassen 2 1 Department of Radiation Biology, Rigshospitalet, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark 2 Department of Oncology, Rigshospitalet, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark 3 Center for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark 4 Department of Neuroradiology, Rigshospitalet, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark 5 Department of Neurosurgery, Rigshospitalet, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark 6 Danish Cancer Society, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark Correspondence to: Dorte Schou Nørøxe, email: anne.dorte.schou.noeroexe@regionh.dk Keywords: glioblastoma; liquid biopsy; cell-free DNA; fragment length; base-pair Received: March 10, 2019 Accepted: May 29, 2019 Published: July 09, 2019 ABSTRACT Background: Glioblastoma (GB) is an incurable brain cancer with limited treatment options. The aim was to test the feasibility of using cell-free DNA (cfDNA) to support evaluation of treatment response, pseudo-progression and whether progression could be found before clinical and/or radiologic progression. Results: CfDNA fluctuated during treatment with the highest levels before diagnostic surgery and at progression. An increase was seen in 3 out of 4 patients at the time of progression while no increase was seen in 3 out of 4 patients without progression. CfDNA levels could aid in 3 out of 3 questionable cases of pseudo-progression. Methods: Eight newly diagnosed GB patients were included. Blood samples were collected prior to diagnosis, before start and during oncologic treatment until progression. Seven patients received concurrent radiotherapy/Temozolomide with adjuvant Temozolomide with one of the patients included in a clinical trial with either immunotherapy or placebo as add-on. One patient received radiation alone. CfDNA concentration was determined for each blood sample. Conclusions: It was feasible to measure cfDNA concentration. Despite the limited cohort size, there was a good tendency between cfDNA and treatment course and -response, respectively with the highest levels at progression.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nørøxe et al. (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: