Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Background: The Latarjet procedure is a common technique to address anteroinferior shoulder instability. However, inadequate positioning of the coracoid bone graft may lead to persistent instability or early arthritis, with complication rates described up to 15% in open procedures. Adequate bone-block positioning tailored to patients' scapular morphology may reduce these complications. This study aims to optimize the Patient-Specific Instrumentation (PSI) Latarjet procedure by detailing the technique and assessing the accuracy of graft positioning through a comparison of the digitally planned and actual surgical outcomes. It is hypothesized that patient-specific, 3D-printed guides will enhance coracoid graft accuracy in the open Latarjet procedure. Methods: Between January and May 2024, 5 patients underwent the open PSI Latarjet procedure. Using computer aided design software, the procedure was digitally planned, followed by the design and production of PSI drill guides utilized in a standard double screw technique. Patients were immobilized for three weeks with radiological evaluations at 6 weeks postoperatively. Results: All patients were included in the analysis. Compared to digitally planning, the median mediolateral displacement was 0.01 mm medially (range 1.8 mm medially-1.7 mm laterally), and the median craniocaudal displacement was 0.97 mm caudally (range 5.16 mm caudally-5.58 mm cranially), from what was digitally planned. Modifications to the PSI guides were made over time to improve accuracy, though one screw was malpositioned in a single case. However, all grafts showed evidence of graft healing within 6 weeks. Conclusion: The open PSI Latarjet procedure is safe and reliable, showing accurate graft positioning at six weeks postsurgery. We believe that 3D printing marks a significant advancement for surgeons, allowing a shift from conventional instruments to innovative, customized solutions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Elzen et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: