The lattice dynamics of cubic BaTiO 3 and SrTiO 3 at different crystal lattice volumes were investigated using first-principles density functional theory calculation. The computational results indicate that the Ti–O and A–O (A = Sr or Ba) interactions are responsible for the unstable ferroelectric Γ 15 and antiferrodistortive R 25 phonons, respectively. With decreasing volume, the Γ 15 phonon behaviors of cubic SrTiO 3 and BaTiO 3 show a similar trend and the Ti–O repulsions are significantly enhanced, leading to the disappearance of ferroelectric instability. However, for BaTiO 3 the large ionic radius of Ba with respect to Sr results in a repulsive Ba–O interaction and thereby the disappearance of the R 25 instability, while the long-range characteristic of Sr–O pair are crucial for the antiferrodistortive instability of cubic SrTiO 3 . By analyzing the real-space interatomic force constants, it can be confirmed that the different antiferrodistortive behaviors of the two compounds are dictated by different short-range repulsions of A–O pairs. Moreover, owing to the smaller ionic radius of Sr relative to Ba, the lattice constant of SrTiO 3 can be significantly reduced, leading to the absence of ferroelectric instability for SrTiO 3 . The substitution and different crystal volumes make the phase transitions of the two compounds entirely different.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Xie et al. (2008) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: