Key result
Long short-term memory (LSTM) models accurately forecasted glucose profiles up to 48 hours in advance with an average mean absolute error of 2.50 mg/dL and root mean square error of 3.7 mg/dL.
Why the study?
Do machine learning and deep learning models accurately predict glucose variability up to 48 hours in advance in individuals using open-source automated insulin delivery systems?
Do machine learning and deep learning models accurately predict glucose variability up to 48 hours in advance in individuals using open-source automated insulin delivery systems?
Machine learning and deep learning models, particularly LSTM, can accurately forecast glucose variability up to 48 hours in advance for users of open-source automated insulin delivery systems.
May inform glucose forecasting in AID users; leaves open clinical adoption pending prospective validation.
Glucose forecasting serves as a backbone for several healthcare applications, including real-time insulin dosing in people with diabetes and physical activity optimization. This paper presents a study on the use of machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL) methods for predicting glucose variability (GV) in individuals with open-source automated insulin delivery systems (AID). A three-stage experimental framework is employed in this work to systematically implement and evaluate ML/DL methods on a large-scale diabetes dataset collected from individuals with open-source AID. The first stage involves data collection, the second stage involves data preparation and exploratory analysis, and the third stage involves developing, fine-tuning, and evaluating ML/DL models. The performance and resource costs of the models are evaluated alongside relative and proportional errors for 17 GV metrics. Evaluation of fine-tuned ML/DL models shows considerable accuracy in glucose forecasting and variability analysis up to 48 h in advance. The average MAE ranges from 2.50 mg/dL for long short-term memory models (LSTM) to 4.94 mg/dL for autoregressive integrated moving average (ARIMA) models, and the RMSE ranges from 3.7 mg/dL for LSTM to 7.67 mg/dL for ARIMA. Model execution time is proportional to the amount of data used for training, with long short-term memory models having the lowest execution time but the highest memory consumption compared to other models. This work successfully incorporates the use of appropriate programming frameworks, concurrency-enhancing tools, and resource and storage cost estimators to encourage the sustainable use of ML/DL in real-world AID systems.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zafar et al. (2023) studied Type 1 Diabetes (n=19). Machine Learning and Deep Learning models (LSTM, ARIMA, XGBoost, RF) vs. Expected glucose profiles (ground truth) was evaluated on Mean Absolute Error (MAE) for glucose forecasting up to 48 hours. Long short-term memory (LSTM) models accurately forecasted glucose profiles up to 48 hours in advance with an average mean absolute error of 2.50 mg/dL and root mean square error of 3.7 mg/dL.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: