Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The adiabatic compressibility of aqueous solutions of octyl-, decyl-, dodecyl- and tetradecyl-trimethylammonium bromides has been determined from measurements of density and ultrasound velocity at different temperatures ranging from 20 to 45 °C at 5 °C intervals. Based on the theoretical treatment in which the adiabatic compressibility is given as a function of concentration, the apparent adiabatic compressibilities of the surfactant in the monomeric (1) and micellar (m) forms are obtained from the experimental results at each temperature. The values for 1 increase with increased temperature, and its temperature coefficient is constant for methyl, octyl and decyl derivatives, but changes sharply between 30 and 40 °C for the dodecyl and tetradecyl derivatives. The value of m increases linearly with increased temperature, and its temperature coefficient increases with increasing alkyl chain length. The linear changes of 1 and m with temperature are related to the change of hydrophilic hydration, while the sharp change of 1 for dodecyl and tetradecyl derivatives is attributed to the change of hydrophobic hydration.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zieliński et al. (1988) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: