Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
SUMMARY Five soil types from Kenya were examined for their ability to release K and Mg to crops by extracting them with a calcium‐saturated cation exchange resin, and for the mineral sources of K and Mg. Amounts and rates of release of exchangeable, short‐ and long‐term reserves of K and Mg were determined. This was done for K before and after one, two and 10 wetting and drying (WD) cycles, designed to mimic the effect of the local climate on K release. The order of decreasing K and Mg contents of the soils was Muguga > > Katumani > Kampi‐ya‐Mawe (KYM) ∼ Ithookwe ∼ Kwale. In the case of K, wetting and drying increased the exchangeable fraction in all of the soils. The Muguga, Ithookwe and KYM soils have the capacity to release a great deal of K in the long‐term, but at very different rates; the Kwale soil has few reserves and fixes K on WD. The K and Mg contents of the soils were closely related to the mica contents of the clay + silt fractions. Exchangeable and non‐exchangeable K was released from soil micas primarily by ion exchange, with some contribution to non‐exchangeable K from dissolution. Release of exchangeable Mg was primarily by ion exchange, whilst that of non‐exchangeable matrix Mg was by dissolution of trioctahedral mica in the clay + silt and the sand fractions of the soils. Response would be expected only to K fertilizers and only with the Kwale soil. However, all the other soils should, in the interests of good husbandry, receive maintenance dressings of K and Mg at convenient times in the crop rotation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
ONCHERE et al. (1989) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: