Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Functional Flours and Chemically Modified Starches (FF&CMS) are commonly used as texturizers in food. Their performance is typically measured by the Swelling Power (SP), the ratio of gelatinized FF&CMS weight to the original weight; and the Solubility (SOL), the ratio of the continuous phase fluid of FF&CMS weight to the original weight. However, these methods do not fully capture the starch's effectiveness or its volume ratio in the product. This study explores these limitations by using various ingredients: Functional Flour (FF), Waxy Wheat Flour (WxF), Waxy Wheat Starch (WxS) and Chemically Modified Wheat Starch (CMS) at concentrations of 4%, 6% and 8% for FF and 4% for WxF, WxS, CMS, used as texturizers in a sauce preparation (% on wb). Particle size distribution Rheological measurement, microscopy, and a revised Swelling Power termed Water Holding Ratio (WHR) were used to assess the actual starch volume contribution were used to better understand the functional properties of flours and starches. Results indicate that SP should be adjusted based on input variables such as starch content and density. While the initial SP calculation does not allow comparison across different concentrations, the WHR provides a more accurate method for comparing functional ingredients. It also allows the Volume Fraction to be calculated . This method can be directly applied to optimize ingredient dosage and assess product stability and consistency.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Béja et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: