Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The trophic role of snappers was evaluated on the continental shelves of the south‐western Gulf of Mexico and the Yucatan in the south‐eastern Gulf of Mexico. Mass‐balanced, steady‐state trophic models of the two ecosystems were constructed with Ecopath and perturbations were simulated in the ecosystems with Ecosim by increasing fishing mortality. Impacts were measured by changes in biomass of snappers and other groups, and in some indices of stability: persistence, recovery time and resilience. The snapper populations differed between ecosystems. The western Gulf of Mexico system appeared more complex and more stable than the Continental Shelf of Yucatan. Although overall stability indices between ecosystem suggested a similar structure and function, there were clear differences at a group level. Correlation of stability attributes between groups suggested differences in the role of snappers between the ecosystems suggesting that each stock should be managed individually.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Arreguı́n-Sánchez et al. (1998) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: