Key result
Elevated hsTnT and NT-proBNP linked to ~40% higher microvascular risk in type 2 diabetes.
Why the study?
The ability of cardiac biomarkers NT-proBNP and hsTnT to predict microvascular event risk in type 2 diabetes was uncertain.
Do cardiac biomarkers NT-proBNP and hsTnT predict microvascular events in patients with type 2 diabetes?
Cohort (n=3,385)
Do cardiac biomarkers NT-proBNP and hsTnT predict microvascular events in patients with type 2 diabetes?
Cardiac biomarkers NT-proBNP and hsTnT moderately improve the prediction of microvascular events, particularly nephropathy, in patients with type 2 diabetes.
OBJECTIVE: We investigated microvascular event risk in people with type 2 diabetes and assessed whether N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) and high-sensitivity troponin T (hsTnT) improved prediction. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: We performed a case-cohort study, including 439 incident cases of microvascular events (new or worsening nephropathy or retinopathy) and 2,946 noncase subjects identified from participants in the Action in Diabetes and Vascular Disease: Preterax and Diamicron Modified Release Controlled Evaluation (ADVANCE) trial. NT-proBNP and hsTnT were measured in stored plasma samples using automated commercial assays. RESULTS: After adjustment for age, sex, and randomized treatment, the hazard ratios for microvascular events per 1-SD increase in the log-transformed hsTnT and NT-proBNP were 1.67 (95% CI 1.51-1.85) and 1.63 (1.44-1.84), respectively. After further adjustment for classical and diabetes-related cardiovascular disease risk factors, the hazard ratios attenuated to 1.40 (1.24-1.58) and 1.41 (1.24-1.60), respectively. While the C statistic did not improve on addition of hsTnT or NT-proBNP for the total microvascular end point, a combination of both markers improved the prediction of nephropathy (P = 0.033) but not retinopathy (P = 0.72). The corresponding net reclassification indices in a three-risk category model (<10%, 10-15%, and >15% 5-year risk) for all microvascular events were 7.31% (95% CI 2.24-12.79) for hsTNT addition, 6.23% (1.74-11.5) for NT-proBNP addition, and 7.1% (1.5-12.9) for both markers together. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that cardiac biomarkers moderately improve microvascular event risk prediction, in particular the risk of nephropathy. Further studies examining the value of this approach for trial design and clinical use are warranted.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Welsh et al. (2014) conducted a cohort in Type 2 diabetes (n=3,385). 1-SD increase in log-transformed hsTnT and NT-proBNP vs. Lower biomarker levels was evaluated on Microvascular events (new or worsening nephropathy or retinopathy) (HR 1.40, 95% CI 1.24-1.58). In patients with type 2 diabetes, a 1-SD increase in hsTnT and NT-proBNP was associated with an increased risk of microvascular events (adjusted HR 1.40, 95% CI 1.24-1.58 and HR 1.41, 95% CI 1.24-1.60).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: