Key result
An acute surgical unit model for appendicectomy increased in-hours operations (79% vs 72%, P=0.014) and reduced complications (6% vs 9%, P=0.031) compared to a traditional model.
Why the study?
Does an acute surgical unit model improve outcomes in patients undergoing appendicectomy?
Cohort (n=1,214)
No
Does an acute surgical unit model improve outcomes in patients undergoing appendicectomy?
Absolute Event Rate: 79% vs 72%
p-value: p=0.014
Implementation of an acute surgical unit model for appendicectomy improves the rate of in-hours operations and reduces surgical complications.
May support acute surgical unit adoption for appendicectomy; leaves open need for randomized confirmation.
BACKGROUND: Few large Australian studies have explored the impact of acute surgical unit (ASU) model in appendicitis. METHODS: An ASU model commenced practice at our institution on 1 August 2012. In this retrospective cohort study, patients undergoing appendicectomy 2.5 years before (Traditional group) or after (ASU group) this date were compared. Primary outcomes were median length of stay, median time from emergency department referral to theatre start and proportion of cases performed in-hours. Secondary outcomes were rates of complications, open appendicectomy, consultant scrubbed for procedure, intensive care unit admission and re-presentation to emergency department within 30 days. RESULTS: After removing those with incomplete data, 1214 patients were enrolled; 465 in the Traditional group and 749 in the ASU group. There were no significant baseline differences between groups. Compared with the Traditional group, ASU patients had similar length of stay (1.81 versus 1.81 days; P = 0.54) and time to theatre (0.59 versus 0.56 days; P = 0.14), but a greater proportion of in-hours operation (72% versus 79%; P = 0.014). The ASU group also experienced fewer complications (9% versus 6%; P = 0.031), fewer primary open (4% versus 1%; P < 0.0001) or conversion-to-open appendicectomies (6% versus 2%; P < 0.0005) and had superior rates of consultant scrubbed in theatre (21% versus 56%; P < 0.00001). Rates of intensive care unit admission (1% versus 1%; P = 0.72) and re-presentation were unchanged (5% versus 5%; P = 0.46). CONCLUSION: In our institution, the introduction of an ASU model was associated with more in-hours operations and safer care for patients undergoing appendicectomy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kinnear et al. (2019) conducted a cohort in Appendicitis (n=1,214). Acute surgical unit (ASU) model vs. Traditional model was evaluated on Proportion of cases performed in-hours (p=0.014). An acute surgical unit model for appendicectomy increased in-hours operations (79% vs 72%, P=0.014) and reduced complications (6% vs 9%, P=0.031) compared to a traditional model.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: