Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
QSAR's are set up for a series of up to 53 cycloaliphatic alcohols with qualitatively defined sandalwood odour characteristics: i-inactive, w-weak, s-strong, and vs-very strong. “Central” values (0, 1, 2, and 3) were attached to these qualitative characteristics, as well as intervals (<0.5; 0.5–1.5; 1.5–2.5; >2.5). The superposition procedure of the MTD method was used to define the probable active conformation. Conformational energies and log Poct values were also calculated using HyperChem-2 and Chemicalc-2. A correlational equations were set up using δ, D and D2–with δ=1 for OH groups in favourable position and D–the distance between the gravity centre of the hydrophobic moiety and the osmophoric OH-group. The MTD method was used only for a series of N=15 rigid molecules, because a too large number of vertices for the whole series appear. Eighter central values or intervals were used as biologic activities. The δ, D and D2–equations set up for N=31 molecules allow a good classification of the training set and also of the rest of molecules, considered as test set. An osmophoric receptor with a hydrophylic part (2 or 3 OH-groups) and a relatively large hydrophobic pocket is suggested, which produces also some steric misfit with regard to these molecules.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hadaruga et al. (1999) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: