Key result
Novel antiplatelet therapies curb adverse cardiac outcomes but heighten bleeding risk compared to conventional agents.
Why the study?
Limitations of conventional antiplatelet therapy and high rates of recurrent ischemic events in CAD and ACS patients motivate investigation of emerging antiplatelet agents.
Do emerging antiplatelet therapies (reversible P2Y12 antagonists and PAR-1 inhibitors) improve outcomes compared to conventional therapy in patients with CAD and ACS?
Do emerging antiplatelet therapies (reversible P2Y12 antagonists and PAR-1 inhibitors) improve outcomes compared to conventional therapy in patients with CAD and ACS?
Emerging antiplatelet therapies offer enhanced prevention of adverse cardiac outcomes in CAD and ACS but require careful patient selection to balance bleeding and thrombosis risks.
May support development of alternate antiplatelet agents in ACS; leaves open which therapies will reduce recurrent events.
Antiplatelet therapy is used widely with proven benefit for the prevention of further ischemic cardiac complications in patients with known coronary artery disease (CAD) and a history of acute coronary syndrome (ACS). The limitations of conventional antiplatelet therapy with aspirin, clopidogrel, or prasugrel, as well as the fact that rates of recurrent ischemic events still remain high with use of these agents, underscore the need to investigate alternate agents that may further reduce event rates while limiting bleeding risk. The selection of antiplatelet therapy is further influenced by the following: ticagrelor was approved in July 2011 by the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA), and clopidogrel is slated to become available as a generic productin 2012. We provide an overview of emerging agents for the treatment of CAD and ACS, including the reversible P2Y(12) antagonists ticagrelor, cangrelor, and elinogrel, and a new class of oral protease-activated receptor-1 (PAR-1) inhibitors, vorapaxar and atopaxar.The recently approved P2Y(12) antagonists prasugrel and ticagrelor demonstrate enhanced ability to prevent adverse cardiac outcomes. However, this comes at a cost of a potential increased risk of bleeding. New adverse effects have also emerged, including dyspnea for all of the reversible P2Y(12) antagonists (ticagrelor, cangrelor, and elinogrel) and ventricular pauses for ticagrelor. In addition, the newer P2Y(12) antagonists have a faster onset and offset. Two of these agents, cangrelor and elinogrel, are available as intravenous formulations, which may provide additional benefits in patients who undergo coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery. Trials with the PAR-1 inhibitors have also shown trends toward reductions in cardiac events, but not without the possibility of increased bleeding. More than ever, as the arsenal of antiplatelet therapy expands, health care providers need to understand the pharmacologic and pharmacodynamic differences between conventional and emerging antiplatelet therapies for patients with ACS and CAD. Health care providers must also carefully assess patient-specific factors such as risk of thrombosis, concomitant disease states, age, drug adherence, and aspirin dose, and plan for those patients who will be undergoing CABG when selecting antiplatelet therapy in order to optimally balance bleeding and thrombosis risk.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Packard et al. (2012) conducted a review in Coronary artery disease and acute coronary syndrome. Emerging antiplatelet therapies (ticagrelor, cangrelor, elinogrel, vorapaxar, atopaxar) vs. Conventional antiplatelet therapy was evaluated. Emerging antiplatelet therapies, including newer P2Y12 antagonists and PAR-1 inhibitors, demonstrate enhanced ability to prevent adverse cardiac outcomes but may increase the risk of bleeding.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: