Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The layered perovskite compounds Na Ln TiO 4 ( Ln = Y, La–Tb) have Ln 2 O 2 rock-salt layers alternating with Na 2 O 2 rock-salt layers on either side of a TiO 2 sheet. The cation ordering introduces an internal electric field perpendicular to the layers. Ion exchange of Li + for Na + changes the rock-salt Na 2 O 2 layers into OLi 2 O antifluorite layers but does not change the charge of the layers or, significantly, the internal electric field. The internal fields induce a ferroic displacement of the Ti(IV) ions toward the alkali-ion layers. Reversible Li insertion is observed in both NaLi x Ln TiO 4 and Li 1+ x Ln TiO 4 with 0 ≤ x ≤ 1; the voltage profiles show Ti(IV)/Ti(III) redox plateaus at 0.5 and 0.1 V vs Li + /Li 0 and a 4f 6 /4f 7 Eu 3+ /Eu 2+ plateau at 0.8 V vs Li + /Li 0 . The shift of 1 eV in the Ti(IV)/Ti(III) redox energy relative to that found in the spinel Li 4 Ti 5 O 12 could be attributed to a capacitance energy associated with the formal +2 e and −2 e charges on the Ln 2 O 2 layers and the alkali-ion layers, respectively. Optical measurements showed that the energy gap between the Ti 3d 0 and O 2p 6 band edges is not significantly different in the layered and spinel titanates.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Song et al. (2013) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: