Mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) is a rare but aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphoma subtype with a poor prognosis; most patients relapse despite initial response to therapy. Response was traditionally evaluated by computed tomography (CT), but the introduction of [(18)F]Fluorine-Deoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography (PET) changed response assessment in aggressive lymphoma. However, the value of PET-evaluation in MCL has not been studied yet. Therefore, PET- and CT-findings were investigated in 37 patients with MCL (239 scans) and categorised following standardised response criteria for CT-evaluation (IWC-criteria), PET-evaluation (EORTC-criteria) and combined PET/CT-evaluation (IWC + PET-criteria). FDG-PET showed a high sensitivity for the detection of deposits of MCL and a higher FDG-uptake was shown in patients with the more aggressive blastoid-variant of MCL versus common MCL. However, routine use of PET for end-of-treatment response assessment in MCL cannot be recommended because CT- and PET-based designation systems had equivalent prognostic value. PET-based end-of-treatment response assessment only provided additional information over CT-based response assessment in a subpopulation of patients with highly FDG-avid MCL. PET allowed early detection of preclinical relapse during post-therapy surveillance, but the therapeutic consequences of such information are currently unclear.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Brepoels et al. (2008) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: