Alternating-current electrical stimulation (AC-ES) may modulate stem-cell responses, but nominal stimulation settings do not define the electric-field exposure at the cell layer, limiting cross-study comparison. Sinusoidal AC-ES was applied to human adipose-derived stem cells (hASC) and human bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells (hMSC-BM) using a validated in vitro framework that combines continuous electrical monitoring with experimentally parameterized, electrode–electrolyte-interface-informed finite-element simulations. The study was designed to relate physically characterized stimulation conditions to early molecular readouts. Electrical measurements revealed frequency-dependent system behavior, while simulations showed amplitude-dependent shifts in cell-layer exposure across defined electric-field ranges. At 20 Hz and 2 Vrms, where cell-layer exposure shifted from predominantly below 5 Vm -1 towards the 5–15 Vm -1 range, osteogenesis- and stress-associated gene expression changed. Higher amplitudes at 20 Hz reduced selected osteogenesis-associated transcripts in hASC, whereas hMSC-BM showed a comparatively stronger osteogenesis-associated response. Markers related to cell death, survival, and proliferation were selectively regulated, while metabolic activity remained comparable with unstimulated controls. Overall, this workflow identifies biologically compatible, parameter-defined AC-ES conditions and supports the rational selection of stimulation settings for subsequent experiments.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lembcke et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: