Key result
The combined HRV/ACC sensor (Firstbeat Bodyguard 2) provided valid estimates of time spent in moderate-to-vigorous physical activity during free-living days compared to the gold-standard ActiGraph GT3X+ (ICC 0.48).
Why the study?
Does the Firstbeat Bodyguard 2 sensor accurately measure physical activity and energy expenditure compared to the ActiGraph GT3X+ in healthy university students?
Observational (n=55)
No
Does the Firstbeat Bodyguard 2 sensor accurately measure physical activity and energy expenditure compared to the ActiGraph GT3X+ in healthy university students?
The Firstbeat Bodyguard 2 sensor is a valid and reliable tool for estimating time spent in different physical activity intensity zones, particularly moderate to vigorous physical activity.
BG2 may reliably track free-living MVPA; supports device validation in healthy adults but leaves clinical adoption open.
The purpose of this research was to determine if the scientific research device combined heart rate variability combined with an acceleration sensor (Firstbeat Bodyguard 2, BG2) was valid and reliable for time spent in different intensity zones in free-living. A total of 55 healthy participants performed 48-h physical activity (PA) monitoring with BG2, ActiGraph GT3X+ (GT3X+), and completed Bouchard Physical Activity Diary (Bouchard) every night. In the available studies, GT3X+ is considered the gold standard scientific research device for PA monitor. We compared BG2 and Bouchard with GT3X+ by difference, correlation, and agreement of PA and energy expenditure (EE) in free-living. The results showed that BG2 estimated PA more accurately than Bouchard, with a modest correlation (r > 0.49), strong agreement (τ > 0.29), and they had the lowest limits of agreement when estimating moderate to vigorous physical activity (MVPA). The EE estimated by Bouchard was the highest among the three methods, and the correlation and agreement between the three methods were high. Our findings showed that the BG2 is valid and reliable for estimating time spent in different intensity zones in free-living, especially in MVPA.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Liu et al. (2022) conducted an observational in Healthy (n=55). Firstbeat Bodyguard 2 (BG2) combined HRV/ACC sensor vs. ActiGraph GT3X+ accelerometer was evaluated on Concurrent validity for estimating moderate to vigorous physical activity (MVPA) time (ICC 0.48, 95% CI 0.25-0.66). The combined HRV/ACC sensor (Firstbeat Bodyguard 2) provided valid estimates of time spent in moderate-to-vigorous physical activity during free-living days compared to the gold-standard ActiGraph GT3X+ (ICC 0.48).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: