Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This study uses numerical modeling to provide a mechanistic discussion of the synthesis of the advanced biofuel candidates, ethyl levulinate and 5-ethoxymethylfurfural, from α/β- d -fructopyranose ( d -fructose) in a condensed phase homogeneous ethanol system at 351 K catalyzed by hydrogen cations. A mechanistic comprehension is pursued by detailed measurements of reactant, intermediate, and product species temporal evolutions, as a function of H 2 SO 4 (0.09, 0.22, and 0.32 mol/L) and d -fructose (0.14, 0.29, and 0.43 mol/L) concentrations, also considering the addition of water to the ethanol media (0, 12, and 24 mass % of water in ethanol). d -Fructose, 5-hydroxymethylfurfural, 5-ethoxymethylfurfural, ethyl levulinate, and several other intermediate species are quantified as major species fractions at 45–85% of the initial d -fructose mass. To inform the mechanistic discussion, mass-conserved chemically authentic kinetic models and empirical rate constants are derived, each assuming a first-order relationship to the hydrogen cation concentration. The optimal synthesized fractions of ethyl levulinate and 5-ethoxymethylfurfural considered as fuel components achieve a mass yield of 63% with respect to the fructose mass and a volumetric energy valorization (Δ H combustion, kcal/mL) of 215% with respect to the ethanol consumed, indicating the viability of the synthesis.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Flannelly et al. (2015) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: