The liquid limit of soils can be measured using either the cup apparatus developed by Casagrande or by the fall-cone method, which is now the standard in much of Europe. This paper will demonstrate, based on a Newmarkian sliding block analysis of the Casagrande percussion test, that these two methods measure different mechanical properties of the soil; the cup test being a measure of specific strength, i.e., strength divided by density, whereas the fall cone is a direct measure of strength. Sources of error in the operation of the percussion test are quantified and a modification to the fall-cone test is proposed to standardize results between the two test methods.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Stuart K. Haigh (2012) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: