Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
It is argued that neuroconstructivism offers the strongest middle ground between nativism and empiricism, and that two domain-general mechanisms—statistical learning and associative learning—do not suffice to explain alone the intricacies of brain development and emergent domain specificity.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Annette Karmiloff‐Smith (2009) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: