In stressful environments, clonality provides plants with reproductive insurance and conservation of limiting nutrients. Hence, clonal growth is expected to be more frequent in floras of cold environments, such as the alpine and arctic regions, than in temperate regions. Evidence for this is largely based on comparisons of the ratio of clonal to non-clonal vascular plant species in local floras, as it is difficult to obtain reliable data that assess the extent of clonality in plant communities. Here we review, to the best of our knowledge, the most comprehensive dataset on the proportion of clonal vascular plant species in regional floras of cold environments/regions. Contrary to our expectations, the results do not show a higher proportion of clonal species in cold environments than in the reference regions. The results rather show regional differences explicable by different species pools and/or climates. More data, which take into account environmental gradients, habitat diversity and different modes of clonal growth, the relative dominance (abundance) of clonal plants, are necessary to test the hypothesis that the ratio of clonal to non-clonal vascular plants in cold environments/regions is higher than elsewhere.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Klimešová et al. (2011) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: