At the 8 km bypass section of Chautagne in the Rhône River, most of the flow is diverted due to hydropower production. The environmental flow to the bypass section of the Rhône River was increased from 10 m3 s−1 (winter) and 20 m3 s−1 (summer) to 50 m3 s−1 (winter) and 70 m3 s−1 (summer) in July 2004. A Norwegian mesohabitat method of classifying the river into physical mesoscale morphological (mesohabitat) classes by visual observation was applied at 10 and 70 m3 s−1. The results show that the dominating classes at both flows are deep and low velocity pools, but a higher physical diversity occurs at 70 m3 s−1, quantified by indices from Simpson (1949) and Shannon and Weaver (1962). In total, 6 per cent of the depth measurements and 0.3 per cent of the velocity measurements were outside the expected range at low flow. At high flow, 16.2 per cent of the depth measurements and 19.6 per cent of the velocity measurements were outside the expected range. The change in mesohabitats gives impacts on the composition and abundance of fish and invertebrates. Rheophilic taxa are favoured by the increased flow while more limnophilic species will find less amount of suitable habitat at 70 m3 s−1. Other studies show that population densities of grayling, brown trout, nase and dace have decreased greatly and become endangered since hydropower development, while densities of gudgeon, minnow and stone loach have increased. Fish habitat preferences from Lamouroux et al. ( 1999a ) and Mallet et al. ( 2000 ) were used. Most of the endangered species need high velocity mesohabitats and both high and low depths during all life stages. The increase of such mesohabitat proportions at 70 m3 s−1 indicates that their population should recover soon. The method may be a useful tool to compare different flow situations and their impact on the invertebrate and fish population structure even in large rivers.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Harby et al. (2007) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: