Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
We present a theoretical study of the mechanism and kinetics of the OH hydrogen abstraction from glycolaldehyde. Optimum geometries, frequencies, and gradients have been computed at the BHandHLYP/6-311++G(d,p) level of theory for all stationary points, as well as for additional points along the minimum energy path (MEP). Energies are obtained by single-point calculations at the above geometries using CCSD(T)/6-311++G(d,p) to produce the potential energy surface. The rate coefficients are calculated for the temperature range 200-500 K by using canonical variational theory (CVT) with small-curvature tunneling (SCT) corrections. Our analysis suggests a stepwise mechanism involving the formation of a reactant complex in the entrance channel and a product complex in the exit channel, for all the modeled paths. The overall agreement between the calculated and experimental kinetic data that are available at 298 K is very good. This agreement supports the reliability of the parameters obtained for the temperature dependence of the glycolaldehyde + OH reaction. The expressions that best describe the studied reaction are k(overall) = 7.76 x 10(-13) e(1328/)(RT) cm(3).molecule(-1).s(-1) and k(overall) = 1.09 x 10(-21)T(3.03) e(3187/)(RT) cm(3) molecule(-1) s(-1), for the Arrhenius and Kooij approaches, respectively. The predicted activation energy is (-1.36 +/- 0.03) kcal/mol, at about 298 K. The agreement between the calculated and experimental branching ratios is better than 10%. The intramolecular hydrogen bond in OO-s-cis glycolaldehyde is found to be responsible for the discrepancies between SAR and experimental rate coefficients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Galano et al. (2004) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: