Influence of Prepartum Fat Supplementation on Subsequent Beef Cow Reproduction and Calf Performance

High fat range supplement ( HFRS ) and HFRS with lipid from soybean soapstock (HFRS-SPH; Consolidated Nutrition, Omaha, NE) were compared with a corn-soybean meal supplement (control). In Exp. 1, primiparous cows were individually fed the control supplement (n = 12), HFRS (n = 12), or HFRS-SPH (n = 10) for 62 ± 2 d prepartum. Heifer body condition score pre- and postpartum did not differ (P=0.78) among groups. Milk production was not influenced (P=0.15) by source of supplement. Somatic cell counts, however, tended to be less (P=0.07) in HFRS-supplemented heifers than in heifers fed the control supplement. At birth, calf body temperature (P=0.8), vigor (P=0.7), and BW (P=0.6), as well as BW gain through 90 d postpartum (P=0.6), did not differ among prepartum supplementation treatments. Plasma concentrations of linoleic acid were greater (P=0.02) in fat-supplemented heifers at 30 d prepartum and at calving compared with heifers on the control treatment; however, concentrations of plasma linoleic acid returned to levels comparable with those in control heifers by 30 d postpartum. Neither number of cows cycling by 90 d postpartum (P=0.15) nor length of the postpartum interval (P=0.25) differed among treatment groups. In Exp. 2, multiparous cows were pen-fed the control supplement (n = 49), HFRS (n = 47), or HFRS-SPH (n = 49) for 59 ± 2 d prepartum. Prior to parturition, cows fed the control supplement had better body condition scores (5.8 ± 0.1; P=0.004) than cows fed either commercial supplement (5.4 ± 0.1). Calf performance (P=0.7) and conception rates (P= 0.5) did not differ among treatments. Productivity of cows and calves was not improved with provision of supplemental fat prepartum.