Respondent-driven sampling is a widely-used network sampling technique, designed to sample from hard-to-reach populations. Estimation from the resulting samples is an area of active research, with software available to compute at least four estimators of a population proportion. Each estimator is claimed to address deficiencies in previous estimators, however those claims are often unsubstantiated. In this study we provide a simulation-based comparison of five existing estimators, focusing on sampling conditions which a recent estimator is designed to address. We find no estimator consistently out-performs all others, and highlight sampling conditions in which each is to be preferred.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tomas et al. (2011) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: