Key result
CLOTS-AF score predicts left atrial appendage thrombus with strong discrimination at an AUC of ~0.82.
Why the study?
Left atrial appendage thrombus risk factors remain poorly defined in patients with AF undergoing cardioversion who are inadequately anticoagulated.
Does the CLOTS-AF score predict left atrial appendage thrombus in patients with atrial fibrillation or atrial flutter undergoing transesophageal echocardiography before cardioversion?
Cohort (n=1,001)
Does the CLOTS-AF score predict left atrial appendage thrombus in patients with atrial fibrillation or atrial flutter undergoing transesophageal echocardiography before cardioversion?
Effect estimate: AUC 0.820 (95% CI 0.752-0.887)
The CLOTS-AF score, combining clinical and echocardiographic parameters, can identify patients with atrial fibrillation at high risk of left atrial appendage thrombus who may benefit from anticoagulation prior to cardioversion.
CLOTS-AF score may aid LAA thrombus risk stratification in AF; leaves open whether it should guide pre-cardioversion decisions pending validation.
Background Transesophageal echocardiography–guided direct cardioversion is recommended in patients who are inadequately anticoagulated due to perceived risk of left atrial appendage thrombus (LAAT); however, LAAT risk factors remain poorly defined. Methods and Results We evaluated clinical and transthoracic echocardiographic parameters to predict LAAT risk in consecutive patients with atrial fibrillation (AF)/atrial flutter undergoing transesophageal echocardiography before cardioversion between 2002 and 2022. Regression analysis identified predictors of LAAT, combined to create the novel CLOTS‐AF risk score (comprising clinical and echocardiographic LAAT predictors), which was developed in the derivation cohort (70%) and validated in the remaining 30%. A total of 1001 patients (mean age, 62±13 years; 25% women; left ventricular ejection fraction, 49.8±14%) underwent transesophageal echocardiography, with LAAT identified in 140 of 1001 patients (14%) and dense spontaneous echo contrast precluding cardioversion in a further 75 patients (7.5%). AF duration, AF rhythm, creatinine, stroke, diabetes, and echocardiographic parameters were univariate LAAT predictors; age, female sex, body mass index, anticoagulant type, and duration were not (all P >0.05). CHADS 2 VASc, though significant on univariate analysis ( P <0.001), was not significant after adjustment ( P =0.12). The novel CLOTS‐AF risk model comprised significant multivariable predictors categorized and weighted according to clinically relevant thresholds (Creatinine >1.5 mg/dL, Left ventricular ejection fraction <50%, Overload (left atrial volume index >34 mL/m 2 ), Tricuspid Annular Plane Systolic Excursion (TAPSE) <17 mm, Stroke, and AF rhythm). The unweighted risk model had excellent predictive performance with an area under the curve of 0.820 (95% CI, 0.752–0.887). The weighted CLOTS‐AF risk score maintained good predictive performance (AUC, 0.780) with an accuracy of 72%. Conclusions The incidence of LAAT or dense spontaneous echo contrast precluding cardioversion in patients with AF who are inadequately anticoagulated is 21%. Clinical and noninvasive echocardiographic parameters may identify patients at increased risk of LAAT better managed with a suitable period of anticoagulation before undertaking cardioversion.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Segan et al. (2023) conducted a cohort in Atrial fibrillation or atrial flutter (n=1,001). CLOTS-AF risk score was evaluated on Left atrial appendage thrombus (LAAT) (AUC 0.820, 95% CI 0.752-0.887). The unweighted CLOTS-AF risk model predicted left atrial appendage thrombus with an area under the curve of 0.820 (95% CI, 0.752-0.887), while the weighted score had an AUC of 0.780.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: