Growing ratoon rice (RR) offers a pathway for enhancing food security; however, the combined contribution of cultivar selection and cultivar-specific nitrogen (N) management on the productivity‒environment nexus remains poorly understood. A five-year field experiment in southeast China was conducted in two sequential phases. The three-year cultivar screening (2019–2021) identified Yongyou 4949 (YY), Hanyou 73 (HY), and Fengliangyouxiang 1 (FLY) as high-yielding cultivars. Under the conventional ratoon-season N rate (175 kg N·ha -1 ) evaluated during 2022–2023, FLY showed superior ratooning performance and N uptake efficiency, together with lower yield-scaled nitrogen and carbon footprints (NF y and CF y ) than YY and HY. Further N-rate evaluation in FLY showed that reducing the ratoon-season N input from 175 (FLY175) to 125 kg N·ha -1 (FLY125) maintained high grain yield, increased the apparent N recovery efficiency by 78%, and reduced reactive N losses by 23%. Compared with FLY175, FLY125 also reduced NF y and CF y by 23% and 18%, respectively, while increasing the net ecosystem economic benefit by 5.7% (or 1.3 × 10 3 CNY·ha -1 ). These improvements were mainly associated with lower ammonia (NH 3 ) volatilization and methane (CH 4 ) emissions. Thus, under the soil, climate, and management conditions of this study, 125 kg N·ha -1 represents a suitable ratoon-season N rate for FLY. Overall, these results support a sequential, cultivar-specific strategy of selecting high-performing cultivars and optimizing their N management. This approach has potential to align farmers’ economic returns with reduced environmental impacts in the Taihu Lake region and other agroecologically similar ratoon rice areas.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jin et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: