This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
Many single-molecule biophysical techniques rely on nanometric tracking of microbeads to obtain quantitative information about the mechanical properties of biomolecules such as chromatin fibers. Their three-dimensional position can be resolved by holographic analysis of the diffraction pattern in wide-field imaging. Fitting this diffraction pattern to Lorentz Mie scattering theory yields the bead position with nanometer accuracy in three dimensions but is computationally expensive. Real-time multiplexed bead tracking therefore requires a more efficient tracking method. Here, we introduce 3D phasor tracking, a fast and robust bead tracking algorithm with nanometric localization accuracy in a z- range of over 10 µm. The algorithm is based on a 2D cross-correlation using Fast Fourier Transforms with computer-generated reference images, yielding a processing rate of up to 10.000 regions of interest per second. We implemented the technique in magnetic tweezers and tracked the 3D position of over 100 beads in real-time on a generic CPU. Its easy implementation, efficiency, and robustness can improve multiplexed biophysical bead tracking applications, especially where high throughput is required. Significance Microbeads are often used in biophysical single-molecule manipulation experiments and accurately tracking their position in 3 dimensions is key for quantitative analysis. Holographic imaging of these beads allows for multiplexing bead tracking but image analysis can be a limiting factor. Here we present a 3D tracking algorithm based on Fast Fourier Transforms that is fast, has nanometric precision, is robust against common artifacts and is accurate over 10’s of micrometers. We show its real-time application for magnetic tweezers based force spectroscopy on more than 100 chromatin fibers in parallel, but we anticipate that many other bead-based biophysical essays can benefit from this simple and robust 3 phasor algorithm.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Brouwer et al. (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: