The band structures of five types of ordered compounds derived from parent zincblende alloys A1−xBxC and AC1−xDx have been determined. Included in this study are two novel x = 14, 34 derived structures, luzonite and famatinite, and three x = 12 structures, chalcopyrite and two 1 × 1 superlattices oriented along the (0,0,1) and (1,1,1) directions. The theory combines an empirical tight-binding model for III-V compounds and a valence force-field model of strain. Strain-induced tetragonal and internal distortion as well as the spin-orbit interaction cause a splitting of the top of the valence band. Trends in this splitting and the band-gap variation are studied for the 18 combinations of III-V elements. The Hopfield quasicubic crystal-field model is found to accurately describe this splitting for all chalcopyrite compounds. But this model fails for several (0,0, 1)- and (1,1, l)-superlattice compounds containing large strain distortions. The extracted Hopfield crystal-field splitting parameter Δcf is found to scale linearly with tetragonal distortion for common-anion compounds ABC2, but follow curvilinearly internal distortion for common-cation compounds. Strain and natural lineup energy modify the band gap significantly from that found in the virtual-crystal approximation for the alloy. For the metastable alloy systems GaAs1−xSbx and GaP1−xSbx, the experimental bowing of the band gap passes quite close to the results for the band gaps of the seven ordered structures.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Teng et al. (1991) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: