Key result
Tei index fails to reliably identify poor left ventricular function or severe aortic stenosis.
Why the study?
The role and limitations of the Tei index in patients with aortic stenosis and left ventricular systolic dysfunction remain incompletely defined.
Does the Tei index accurately identify poor left ventricular function or severe aortic stenosis in patients with AS?
Observational (n=80)
Does the Tei index accurately identify poor left ventricular function or severe aortic stenosis in patients with AS?
The Tei index has limited clinical utility in individual patients with aortic stenosis due to its lack of discrimination for poor LV function or severe AS.
Tei index should not guide individual decisions in AS; hypothesis-generating for any incremental prognostic role in prospective cohorts.
BACKGROUND: The omnibus Tei index, the sum of isovolumic contraction and relaxation times divided by the ejection time, is a good indicator of global cardiac function. However, these time intervals can be influenced by valvular heart disease and the role of the Tei index among patients with aortic stenosis (AS) and left ventricular systolic dysfunction remains incompletely defined. METHODS: Doppler time intervals were measured retrospectively by two observers, and the Tei index were calculated on 80 patients with various degrees of left ventricular systolic dysfunction and severity of AS. Differences between observers were resolved by consensus. Ejection fraction (EF) was visually estimated, and the aortic valve area (AVA) was calculated using the continuity equation. RESULTS: The mean AVA was 1.1+/-0.5 cm(2) and the mean EF was 0.39+/-0.15. Although correlation (r = 0.61, P < 0.001) and agreement (intraclass correlation coefficient=0.55) for the Tei index were satisfactory, there were significant differences between observers (P < 0.001). Using consensus data, the mean Tei index was 0.32+/-0.20 and significantly lower among patients with severe compared with less severe AS (P=0.01). The index varied inversely with left ventricular function (P=0.003). However, receiver operating characteristic analysis shows that the Tei index lacks discrimination in accurately identifying poor left ventricular function or severe AS or both. CONCLUSION: The Tei index varies inversely with systolic ventricular function (low index with good EF) and positively with severity of AS (low index with smaller valve area). As such, it may have limited utility among individual patients with AS.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sud et al. (2009) conducted an observational in Aortic stenosis and left ventricular systolic dysfunction (n=80). Tei index was evaluated on Discrimination in accurately identifying poor left ventricular function or severe aortic stenosis. The Tei index varied inversely with left ventricular function (P=0.003) and was lower in severe aortic stenosis (P=0.01), but lacked discrimination in identifying poor function or severe disease.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: