// Lina Zhao 1 , Man Xu 1 , Wen Jiang 2 , Haitao Pan 3 , Jian Zang 1 , Shanquan Luo 1 , Jianhua Wang 1 , Yongchun Zhou 1 , Mei Shi 1 1 Department of Radiation Oncology, Xijing Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University. Xi’an, China 2 Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, 77030, USA 3 Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, 77030, USA Correspondence to: Mei Shi, email: mshi82@hotmail.com Keywords: nasopharyngeal carcinoma, induction chemotherapy, IMRT, non-endemic region, WHO II/III Received: July 05, 2016 Accepted: December 05, 2016 Published: December 27, 2016 ABSTRACT Background : The role of induction chemotherapy is less clear in non-endemic locally advanced nanopharyngeal carcinomas (NPC). Results : With a total of 233 eligible patients and a median follow-up of 36 months, 3-year overall survival (OS), local recurrence-free survival (LRFS), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), disease free survival (DFS) were 84.5%, 94.9%, 78.6% and 69.2%, respectively. The overall failure rate was 21.0% and distant metastasis occurred in 17.2% patients. Multivariate analyses showed that retropharyngeal and bilateral neck lymph node metastasis were significant prognostic factors for DFS and OS. Moreover, patients receiving both GP (gemcitabine+cisplatin) and TP (docetaxel+cisplatin) regimes had significantly higher DFS and OS compared with PF (cisplatin+5-FU) regime. GP regimes lead to significantly improved OS than TP/PF in some subgroup of patients. No severe toxicities were observed. Materials and Methods : We retrospectively analyzed stage III-IVb NPC patients treated between Jan 2006 and Dec 2014, with induction chemotherapy followed by concurrent chemoradiation (IC-CCRT). Statistical analyses were performed on survival and failure patterns. Conclusions: These results suggested IC-CCRT was safe and effective for NPCs from non-endemic region. The choice of induction regimen appeared to affect patient outcomes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhao et al. (2016) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: