Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
BACKGROUND: AABB Standard 5.27 requires transfusion services to have a process for urgent release of blood before completion of compatibility testing. Our institution endorses a policy for the emergency release of group O, D+ red blood cells (RBC; O+ RBC) to males and females at least 50 years of age. Our emergency department (ED) stocks 4 O- RBC units. To determine if O+ RBCs can replace ED O- RBCs, we performed a retrospective review. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Patients admitted to the ED between January 2001 and August 2011 and transfused emergency-release O- RBCs were identified. Data were collected on sex, age, length of stay, clinical status, ABO/Rh, RBC transfusions, and RBC antibody screen results. RESULTS: A total of 498 ED O- RBC units were transfused to 268 patients (168 male, 100 female). A total of 322 units were transfused to males and 114 to females at least 50 years of age. Thirty-nine (14%) were D- with 18 receiving O+ RBCs. A total of 109 had follow-up antibody screens; one D- patient developed alloanti-D. CONCLUSIONS: The findings support the placement of O+ RBCs in the ED. The majority of ED O- RBCs (88%) went to patients who qualified for O+ RBCs; a minority (1.5%) of patients were D- females less than 50 years of age. The rate of alloimmunization was low.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Meyer et al. (2014) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: