Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
PURPOSE: Laser physics dictate that maximal radiant exposure occurs when the laser strikes the target at a normal incidence. Since the renal collecting system often limits nephroscope movements during percutaneous nephrolithotomy, the laser-calculus incidence angle may vary. We have observed during holmium:YAG percutaneous nephrolithotomy that the side firing fiber more easily approaches a normal incidence compared to the end firing fiber. We test the hypothesis that holmium:YAG percutaneous nephrolithotomy is faster with a side firing fiber compared to an end firing fiber. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Consecutive holmium:YAG percutaneous nephrolithotomy cases were studied retrospectively. The calculus size and composition, surgical time, fragmentation speed (size/time) and stone-free rates were compared between 11 patients treated with end and 8 treated with side firing fibers. RESULTS: When the end and side firing groups were compared, calculus sizes (mean plus or minus standard deviation) were 22 +/- 13 versus 48 +/- 17 mm. (p = 0.004), calcium oxalate monohydrate incidence was 55 versus 75% (p = 0.3), surgical times were 168 +/- 87 versus 124 +/- 51 minutes, computed fragmentation speeds were 0.15 +/- 0.09 versus 0.43 +/- 0.15 mm. per minute (p = 0.0009) and stone-free rates were 73 versus 88% (p = 0.4), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The side firing fiber is faster than the end firing fiber for holmium:YAG percutaneous nephrolithotomy. These results are consistent with principles of laser physics.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Teichman et al. (1998) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: