A three-step bio-oil production process involving torrefaction pretreatment (at 225, 250, or 275 °C with a 20 min hold time), pyrolysis (at 500 °C with two heating rates), and secondary catalytic processing over HZSM-5 (at 400, 450, or 500 °C) was studied to determine process effects, particularly of torrefaction, on the yield of liquid and aromatic hydrocarbons and the quality of upgraded bio-oil. When bio-oils derived from torrefied biomass were catalytically cracked, average yields (%, w/w of feed) of reactor char (100% reduction), catalyst coke (21.4%), and catalyst tar (8.1%) were significantly reduced relative to the best-case conditions using non-torrefied feedstock. The reduction in coke (%, w/w of feed) as a result of torrefaction was 28.5% relative to the respective control for slow-pyrolysis bio-oil upgrading and 34.9% for fast-pyrolysis bio-oil upgrading. The concentration of aromatic product (benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, and xylene, i.e., BTEX) was highest at 95 g L –1 for upgraded (at 500 °C) fast-pyrolysis bio-oil derived from biomass torrefied at 275 °C. Catalyst effectiveness for BTEX production significantly increased with increased torrefaction and catalytic cracking temperatures.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hilten et al. (2013) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: