Key result
Edoxaban maintains consistent antithrombotic efficacy over fondaparinux under high-shear arterial flow in rats.
Why the study?
The differential antithrombotic efficacy of edoxaban and fondaparinux under varying shear rates in venous and arterial thrombosis models was unclear.
Does edoxaban provide more consistent antithrombotic efficacy than fondaparinux across different shear rates in rat thrombosis models?
Does edoxaban provide more consistent antithrombotic efficacy than fondaparinux across different shear rates in rat thrombosis models?
Edoxaban maintains consistent antithrombotic efficacy across low and high shear rate conditions in preclinical models, unlike fondaparinux.
Edoxaban shows consistent efficacy across rat shear models; leaves open whether this yields clinical advantage over fondaparinux in humans.
Edoxaban is an oral, direct factor Xa (FXa) inhibitor under late-phase clinical development. This study compared the antithrombotic efficacy of edoxaban with that of an indirect FXa inhibitor, fondaparinux, in in vivo venous and arterial thrombosis models and in ex vivo perfusion chamber thrombosis model under low and high shear rates in rats. Venous and arterial thrombi were induced by platinum wire insertion into the inferior vena cava and by application of FeCl₃ to the carotid artery, respectively. The perfusion chamber thrombus was formed by blood perfusion into a collagen-coated capillary at 150 s⁻¹ (low shear rate) and 1,600 s⁻¹ (high shear rate). Effective doses of edoxaban that reduced thrombus formation by 50% (ED₅₀) in venous and arterial thrombosis models were 0.076 and 0.093 mg/kg/h, respectively. In contrast, ED₅₀ of fondaparinux in the arterial thrombosis model (>10 mg/kg/h) was markedly higher compared to ED₅₀ in the venous thrombosis model (0.021 mg/kg/h). In the perfusion chamber thrombosis model, the ratio of ED₅₀ under high shear rate (1.13 mg/kg/h) to that under low shear rate (0.63 mg/kg/h) for edoxaban was 1.9, whereas that for fondaparinux was more than 66. While the efficacy of fondaparinux markedly decreased in arterial thrombosis and in a high-shear state, edoxaban exerted consistent antithrombotic effects regardless of flow conditions. These results suggest that shear rate is a key factor in different antithrombotic effects between edoxaban and fondaparinux.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tsuji et al. (2011) studied Thrombosis. Edoxaban vs. Fondaparinux was evaluated on Effective dose reducing thrombus formation by 50% (ED50). Edoxaban exerted consistent antithrombotic effects regardless of flow conditions, whereas fondaparinux efficacy markedly decreased in arterial thrombosis and high-shear states in rats.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: