Relationship Between Distortion Product Otoacoustic Emissions and Hearing Loss

No AccessPerspectives on AudiologyArticle1 Jun 2006Relationship Between Distortion Product Otoacoustic Emissions and Hearing Loss Tiffany A. Johnson, Stephen T. Neely, and Michael P. Gorga Tiffany A. Johnson Boys Town National Research HospitalOmaha, NE Google Scholar More articles by this author , Stephen T. Neely Boys Town National Research HospitalOmaha, NE Google Scholar More articles by this author and Michael P. Gorga Boys Town National Research HospitalOmaha, NE Google Scholar More articles by this author https://doi.org/10.1044/poa2.1.2 SectionsAboutFull TextPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationTrack Citations ShareFacebookTwitterLinked In References American National Standards Institute. (1996). Specifications for audiometers.New York: Author. Google Scholar Brown, A. M.,Sheppard, S. L., & Russell, P. T. (1994). Acoustic distortion products (ADP) from the ears of term infants and young adults using low stimulus levels.British Journal of Audiology, 28, 273–280. Google Scholar Brownell, W. (1983). Observations on a motile response in isolated outer hair cells.In W. R. Webster & L. Aitken(Eds.), Mechanisms of hearing (pp. 5–10). Clayton, Australia: Monash University Press. Google Scholar Cooper, N. P., & Yates, G. K. (1994). Nonlinear input-output functions derived from the responses of guinea-pig cochlear nerve fibers: Variations with characteristic frequency.Hearing Research, 78, 221–234. Google Scholar Dorn, P. A.,Piskorski, P.,Gorga, M. P.,Neely, S. T., & Keefe, D. H. (1999). Predicting audiometric status from distortion product otoacoustic emissions using multivariate analyses.Ear and Hearing, 20, 149–163. Google Scholar Gaskill, S. A., & Brown, A. M. (1990). The behavior of the acoustic distortion product, 2f1-f2, from the human ear and its relation to auditory sensitivity.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America,, 88, 821–839. Google Scholar Gorga, M. P.,Dierking, D. M.,Johnson, T. A.,Beauchaine, K. L.,Garner, C. A., & Neely, S. T. (2005). A validation and potential clinical application of multivariate analyses of distortion-product otoacoustic emission data. Ear and Hearing, 26, 593–607. CrossrefGoogle Scholar Gorga, M. P.,Neely, S. T.,Bergman, B.,Beauchaine, K. L.,Kaminski, J. R.,Peters, J.,et al. (1993). Otoacoustic emissions from normal-hearing and hearing-impaired subjects: Distortion product responses.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 93, 2050–2060. Google Scholar Gorga, M. P.,Neely, S. T., & Dorn, P. A. (1999). Distortion product otoacoustic emission test performance for a prior criteria and for multifrequency audiometric standards. Ear and Hearing, 20, 345–362. Google Scholar Gorga, M. P.,Neely, S. T.,Johnson, T. A.,Dierking, D., & Garner, C. (in press). The relation between distortion product otoacoustic emissions and hearing loss.In M. S Robinette & T. J. Glattke(Eds.), Otoacoustic emissions: Clinical applications (3rd ed.). New York: Thieme Medical Publishers. Google Scholar Gorga M. P.Neely S. T.Ohlrich B.Hoover B.Redner J. & Peters J.(1997). Fromlaboratory to clinic: A large scale study of distortion product otoacoustic emissions in ears with normal hearing and ears with hearing loss.Ear and Hearing, 18, 440–455. Google Scholar Harris, F. P.,Lonsbury-Martin, B. L.,Stagner, B. B.,Coats, A. C., & Martin, G. K. (1989). Acoustic distortion products in humans: Systematic changes in amplitudes as a function of f2/f1 ratio.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 85, 220–229. Google Scholar Hicks, M. L., & Bacon, S. P. (1999). Psychophysical measures of auditory nonlinearities as a function of frequency in individuals with normal hearing.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 105, 326–338. Google Scholar Johnson, T. A.,Neely, S. T.,Garner, C. A., & Gorga, M. P. (2006). Influence of primary-level and primary-frequency ratios on human distortion product otoacoustic emissions.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 119, 418–428. Google Scholar Keefe, D. H. (2002). Spectral shapes of forward and reverse transfer functions between ear canal and cochlea estimated using DPOAE in-put/output functions.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 111, 249–260. Google Scholar Kim, D. O. (1986). Active and nonlinear cochlear biomechanics and the role of the outer-hair-cell subsystem in the mammalian auditory system.Hearing Research, 22, 105–114. Google Scholar Kim, D. O.,Paparello, J.,Jung, M. D.,Smurzynski, J., & Sun, X. (1996). Distortion product otoacoustic emission test of sensorineural hearing loss: Performance regarding sensitivity, specificity, and receiver operating characteristics.Acta Otolaryngology (Stockholm), 116, 3–11. Google Scholar Kimberley, B. P.,Hernadi, I.,Lee, A. M., & Brown, D. K. (1994). Predicting pure tone thresholds in normal and hearing-impaired ears with distortion product emission and age. Ear and Hearing, 15, 199–209. Google Scholar Kummer, P.,Janssen, T., & Arnold, W.(1998). The level and growth behavior of the 2fj-f2 distortion product otoacoustic emission and its relationship to auditory sensitivity in normal hearing and cochlear hearing loss.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 103, 3431–3444. Google Scholar Kummer, P.,Janssen, T.,Hulin, P., & Arnold, W. (2000). Optimal LrL2 primary-tone level separation remains independent of test frequency in humans.Hearing Research, 146, 47–56. Google Scholar Lonsbury-Martin, B. L., & Martin, G. K. (1990). The clinical utility of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions.Ear and Hearing, 11, 144–154. Google Scholar Lopez-Poveda, E. A.,Plack, C. J., & Meddis, R. (2003). Cochlear nonlinearity between 500 and 8000 Hz in listeners with normal hearing.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 113, 951–960. Google Scholar Martin, G. K.,Ohlms, L. A.,Franklin, D. J.,Harris, F. P., & Lonsbury-Martin, B. L. (1990). Distortion product emissions in humans. III. Influence of sensorineural hearing loss.Annals of Otology, Rhinology, and Laryngology Suppl., 147, 30–42. Google Scholar Moore, B. C. J.,Vickers, D. A.,Plack, C. J., & Oxenham, A. J. (1999). Interrelationship between different psychoacoustic measures assumed to be related to the cochlear active mechanism.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 106, 2761–2778. Google Scholar Musiek, F. E., & Baran, J. A. (1997). Distortion product otoacoustic emissions: Hit and false-positive rates in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired subjects.American Journal of Otology, 18, 454–461. Google Scholar Neely, S. T.,Johnson, T. A., & Gorga, M. P. (2005). Distortion-product otoacoustic emission measured with continuously varying stimulus level.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 117, 1248–1259. Google Scholar Nelson, D. A., & Kimberley, B. P. (1992). Distortion-product emissions and auditory sensitivity in human ears with normal hearing and cochlear hearing loss.Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 35, 1142–1159. ASHAWireGoogle Scholar Nelson, D. A., & Schroder, A. C. (2004). Peripheral compression as a function of stimulus level and frequency region in normal-hearing listeners.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America,, 115, 2221–2233. Google Scholar Plack, C. J., & Drga, V. (2003). Psychophysical evidence for auditory compression at low characteristic frequencies.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 109, 1496–1502. Google Scholar Puria, S. (2003). Measurements of human middle ear forward and reverse acoustics: Implications for otoacoustic emissions.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 113, 2773–2789. Google Scholar Sewell, W. F. (1984). The effects of furo-semide on the endocochlear potential and auditory-nerve fiber tuning curves in cats.Hearing Research, 14, 305–314. Google Scholar Stover, L.,Gorga, M. P.,Neely, S. T., & Montoya, D. (1996). Towards optimizing the clinical utility of distortion product otoacoustic emission measurements.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 100, 956–967. Google Scholar Swets, J. A. (1988). Measuring the accuracy of diagnostic systems.Science, 240, 1285–1293. CrossrefGoogle Scholar Swets, J. A., & Pickett, R. M. (1982). Evaluation of diagnostic systems: Methods from signal detection.New York: Academic Press. Google Scholar Whitehead, M. L.,McCoy, M. J.,Lonsbury-Martin, B.L.,&Martin,G.K. (1995). Dependence of distortion product otoacoustic emissions on primary levels in normal and impaired ears. I Effects of decreasing L2 below L1. .Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 97, 2346–2358. Google Scholar Additional Resources FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 2Issue 1June 2006Pages: 2-9 Get Permissions Add to your Mendeley library History Published in issue: Jun 1, 2006 Metrics Topicsasha-topicsasha-article-typesCopyright & PermissionsCopyright © 2006 American Speech-Language-Hearing AssociationPDF downloadLoading ...