Key result
Two-stage segmentation framework transfers cavity segmentation across centers more consistently than atrial wall segmentation.
Why the study?
Automated segmentation of bi-atrial structures from LGE-MRI in atrial fibrillation is challenging due to thin-walled anatomy, domain shifts across imaging centres, and limited benchmarking of existing methods.
A novel 2D and 3D segmentation framework provides a reproducible benchmark for automated bi-atrial wall and cavity segmentation from LGE-MRI in atrial fibrillation.
Cautions against direct multi-center use of wall segmentation models; leaves open need for domain adaptation before clinical AF LGE-MRI adoption.
Accurate delineation of bi-atrial structures from late gadolinium enhancement MRI (LGE-MRI) is an important prerequisite for structural analysis and future fibrosis-quantification workflows in atrial fibrillation (AF). However, automated segmentation is challenging due to thin-walled anatomy, domain shifts across imaging centres, and limited benchmarking of existing methods. This study presents a two-stage segmentation framework and benchmarking platform for evaluating how ROI localisation, encoder design, 2D/3D dimensionality, and ensemble fusion affect bi-atrial wall and cavity segmentation across multicentre LGE-MRI datasets. The framework integrates 3D localisation and fine segmentation using 2D and 3D U-Net variants with ResNeXt encoders and compares them with convolutional, transformer-based, and state-space architectures. Evaluation across three independent cohorts assessed accuracy and cross-domain transfer without target-domain fine-tuning. Cavity segmentation transferred more consistently across centres than atrial wall segmentation, while wall performance remained sensitive to domain shift, particularly in the Kobe cohort. By quantifying how 2D, 3D, and ensemble architectures behave across centres and between walls and cavities, this work provides a reproducible benchmark for future methodological development and clinical validation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gunawardhana et al. (2026) studied Atrial Fibrillation. Two-stage segmentation framework (2D and 3D U-Net variants) vs. Convolutional, transformer-based, and state-space architectures was evaluated on Accuracy and cross-domain transfer of bi-atrial wall and cavity segmentation. A two-stage segmentation framework demonstrated that cavity segmentation transferred more consistently across centres than atrial wall segmentation, which remained sensitive to domain shift.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: