Key result
Single decapolar catheter achieves similar bidirectional isthmus block rates vs Halo catheter in flutter ablation.
Why the study?
The reliability and cost-effectiveness of a single decapolar electrode as a substitute for the 'Halo' catheter to map atrial flutter circuits and detect bidirectional isthmus block were uncertain.
Does a single decapolar electrode provide reliable mapping and detection of bidirectional isthmus block compared to a 'Halo' catheter in patients undergoing atrial flutter ablation?
Cohort (n=35)
Does a single decapolar electrode provide reliable mapping and detection of bidirectional isthmus block compared to a 'Halo' catheter in patients undergoing atrial flutter ablation?
Absolute Event Rate: 91.7% vs 81.8%
p-value: p=NS
A single decapolar electrode is a reliable and cost-effective alternative to the 'Halo' catheter for mapping and demonstrating bidirectional isthmus block during atrial flutter ablation.
May support decapolar electrode as alternative for AFL mapping; hypothesis-generating and leaves open need for randomized validation before practice change.
AIMS: To evaluate whether a single decapolar electrode is a reliable and cost-effective substitute for the 'Halo' catheter to map the circuit and detect bidirectional isthmus block during atrial flutter (AFL) ablation. METHODS AND RESULTS: Twenty-four patients underwent AFL ablation by using the decapolar electrode in the infero-lateral wall of right atrium (group A) while a 'Halo' catheter was used in 11 patients (group B). Both groups had similar clinical characteristics. Anti-clockwise rotation (20 patients), clockwise (3 patients) or both forms of AFL (1 patient) were detected in group A. All patients in group B had anti-clockwise AFL. Bidirectional isthmus block was completed in 22 patients of group A and in 9 of group B (P=NS) while incomplete isthmus block was detected in 2 patients in each group (P=NS). Mean fluoroscopy and procedure time was 27 +/- 47 min, 107 +/- 36 min in group A and 14 +/- 19 min, 114 +/- 65 min in group B (P=NS). AFL relapsed in 3 patients of group A (follow-up 7 +/- 4 months) and in 2 of group B (4 +/- 2 months). CONCLUSION: A single decapolar electrode is a reliable method to map the circuit and demonstrate bidirectional isthmus block during AFL ablation. The cost of the decapolar electrode is a quarter of that of the 'Halo' catheter. This represents a significant saving particularly for centres with a substantial number of AFL ablations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nikolaos Fragakis (2001) conducted a cohort in Atrial flutter (n=35). Single decapolar electrode vs. 'Halo' catheter was evaluated on Bidirectional isthmus block (p=NS). A single decapolar electrode achieved bidirectional isthmus block in 91.7% of patients compared to 81.8% with a 'Halo' catheter (P=NS) during atrial flutter ablation.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: