Key result
Repaglinide with or without metformin fails to improve brachial artery endothelial function.
Why the study?
The effect of short-term improvements in glycaemic control on brachial artery endothelial function as a marker of cardiovascular health in poorly controlled Type 2 diabetes was unclear.
Does short-term improvement in glycaemic control with repaglinide or repaglinide plus metformin improve brachial artery endothelial function in persons with poorly controlled Type 2 diabetes?
RCT (n=86)
Does short-term improvement in glycaemic control with repaglinide or repaglinide plus metformin improve brachial artery endothelial function in persons with poorly controlled Type 2 diabetes?
Mean Difference: 0.08 (95% CI -0.48–0.64)
p-value: p=0.77
Short-term improvements in glycaemic control over 16 weeks did not significantly improve brachial artery endothelial function in patients with poorly controlled Type 2 diabetes.
Short-term glycaemic improvement did not enhance endothelial function; leaves open whether longer or more intensive control affects cardiovascular outcomes.
OBJECTIVE: To examine the effect of short-term improvements in glycaemic control on brachial artery endothelial function as a marker of cardiovascular health. METHODS: Persons with Type 2 diabetes who were poorly controlled on oral therapy were randomly assigned to monotherapy with repaglinide or combination therapy with repaglinide plus metformin. Brachial artery flow-mediated vasodilation was assessed by ultrasonography at randomization and following 16 weeks of therapy. The primary outcome was change in brachial artery endothelial function from baseline. Comparison of randomized groups was a secondary aim. RESULTS: Eighty-six participants were randomized, and 83 were followed to study completion. Post occlusion brachial artery vasodilation was 3.74% at baseline and 3.82% following 16 weeks of therapy (P = 0.77). The treatment effect was 0.08% (95% CI: -0.48%, 0.64%). No difference was seen between treatment groups (P = 0.69). Overall, A1C was reduced from 8.3% to 7.0%, with a greater reduction in the combination therapy group (from 8.4% to 6.7%) than in the monotherapy group (from 8.3% to 7.3%, p for difference between groups = 0.01). Statistically significant reductions were observed in fasting glucose, and plasminogen activator inhibitor-1. Statistically significant increases were observed for fasting insulin, uric acid, weight and BMI. CONCLUSIONS: Brachial artery endothelial function was not influenced by short-term improvements in glycaemic control. The CONTROL DM group was successful in lowering A1C. Future research should explore more intensive and longer-lasting improvements in glycaemic control on endothelial function. Some data previously published in abstract form (Diabetes 2001; 50 (Suppl. 2): A217).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Reboussin et al. (2004) conducted an RCT in Type 2 diabetes (n=86). Combination therapy with repaglinide plus metformin vs. Monotherapy with repaglinide was evaluated on change in brachial artery endothelial function from baseline (MD 0.08%, 95% CI -0.48, 0.64, p=0.77). Short-term improvements in glycaemic control using repaglinide with or without metformin did not significantly change brachial artery endothelial function from baseline (MD 0.08%; 95% CI -0.48 to 0.64; P=0.77).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: