Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
In women and non-human primates, treatment with anti-progestins suppresses oestrogen-dependent mitotic activity in the endometrial glands. This anti-proliferative effect is paradoxical, because anti-progestins do not bind to the oestrogen receptor. Although this phenomenon has been termed a 'non-competitive anti-oestrogenic effect', it does not occur in all species or in other regions of the primate reproductive tract, so is best referred to as an 'endometrial anti-proliferative effect'. The abundance of androgen receptors is greatly increased by anti-progestin treatment, especially in the glandular epithelium in non-human primates and women. Such an increase could lead to an enhancement of androgen action in the endometrium. As androgens suppress oestrogen-dependent endometrial proliferation, the increased abundance of androgen receptors could mediate the anti-proliferative effects of anti-progestin treatment. This brief review evaluates the implications of these findings.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Brenner et al. (2002) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: