Will the Human Genome Project'S (HGP) social policy research program function as an “enhancer” and “promoter” for the entire “sequence,” or will it result in missense and nonsense mutations? The jury, of course, is still out, but we believe it is more properly viewed as a key promoter that is integral to the proper functioning of the HGP itself.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Annas et al. (1992) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched one closely related paper. Consider it for comparative context: