Two processes to produce hydrogen via steam reforming are compared in a laboratory fixed bed reactor: conventional steam reforming with a nickel-based catalyst and sorbent-enhanced steam reforming with a mixture of a nickel-based catalyst and CaO−Ca 12 Al 14 O 33 sorbent. A preliminary thermodynamic study was performed to determine the operating window of the sorption enhanced reforming at atmospheric pressure. Operating temperatures less than 650 °C are required to take advantage of the favorable thermodynamics due to the in situ capture of CO 2, while maximum gain in methane conversion between the two process options is attained for a steam to methane molar ratio of around 3. Under these conditions, CaO−Ca 12 Al 14 O 33 (85:15 wt) synthesized using calcium acetate as a CaO precursor acted as an effective CO 2 sorbent, reducing by 67% the amount of total CO 2 that would have been emitted in conventional steam reforming. Due to CO 2 capture, the methane steam reforming equilibrium shifted to higher hydrogen purities. Hydrogen concentrations higher than 92%, on a dry basis, were achieved at 650 °C, 1 atm of pressure, and a steam to methane molar ratio of 3.4, as opposed to 77% produced under the same conditions via the conventional steam reforming. The experimental reactor was operated batchwise and with cyclic alternation between reforming/sorption conditions and higher-temperature conditions to regenerate the sorbent. The performance of the material is deemed adequate as a moderate loss (ca. 15%) in sorption capacity after 13 consecutive cycles was observed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Martavaltzi et al. (2010) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: